Matches In The Entire Database

12 MARKER – EXACT MATCH      1 MATCH(ES)

12 Marker - Exact Match 1 Match(es)

John (sh-62) Shelton (Y37)

thall451@comcast.net

FTDNA Tip
25 Marker - Exact Match 3 Match(es)
 

In comparing 12 markers, the probability that John (. Shelton and Mr. John E. Sharp shared a common ancestor within the last...

Comparison Chart

4 generations is
33.57%

8 generations is
55.88%

12 generations is
70.69%

16 generations is
80.53%

20 generations is
87.07%

24 generations is
91.41%
 
 
 

25 MARKER – EXACT MATCH      3 MATCH(ES)

 
 

John (sh-62) Shelton (Y37)

thall451@comcast.net

FTDNA Tip

David Allen Emerson (Y37)

kimemersonsanta@centurytel.net

FTDNA Tip

Everett Glenn Emerson (Y67)

everettege@webtv.net

FTDNA Tip
25 Marker - Genetic Distance - 1 3 Match(es)
 

In comparing 25 markers, the probability that John Shelton, David Allen Emerson, and Everett Glenn Emerson and Mr. John E. Sharp shared a common ancestor within the last...

Comparison Chart

4 generations is
61.17%

8 generations is
84.92%

12 generations is
94.15%

16 generations is
97.73%

20 generations is
99.12%

24 generations is
99.66%

The above numbers are based exclusively on the comparison of their Y-DNA results, which show no mismatches†.

 

25 MARKER – GENETIC DISTANCE - 1      3 MATCH(ES)

 

James Anthony Emerson (Y67)

emersonwe@bellsouth.net

GEDCOMFTDNA Tip

Jack Ray Henderson (Y37)

vwbeng@cruzio.com

FTDNA Tip

Mr. F. Robert Henderson (Y37)

frbhndrs@aol.com

GEDCOMFTDNA Tip
25 Marker - Genetic Distance - 2 4 Match(es)
 

In comparing 25 markers, the probability that James A. Emerson,  Jack Ray Henderson, and Mr.  R Robert Henderson and Mr. John E. Sharp shared a common ancestor within the last...

(note: slight variation of less than 1/100 percentages between the three comparisons)

h4 generations is
27.74%

8 generations is
58.51%

12 generations is
78.49%

16 generations is
89.48%

20 generations is
95.04%

24 generations is
97.72%

 

(James Anthony Emerson)  (NORTH CAROLINA) (lineage per submitted gedcom)

1 (private) 2 (James Walter Emerson; 3 John Oscar Emerson; 4 John W Emerson (1845 Rowan Co NC) & Malinda Wiles;  5 William Emerson (abt 1816NC) & Eliz Hall; 6  Wm Emerson; 7 George Emerson Sr (bef 1775 Rowan Co NC)

(F Robert Henderson) (TENNESSEE - VIRGINIA) (DUPLICATE) (lineage per submitted gedcom)

1 Robert Henderson; 2 Frank Paul Henderson; 3 Joseph Melvin Henderson & Josephine Amelia Sharp (1884 Sever Co, TN); 4 James Preston Henderson & Anna Evalista Burchfiel (1868 Sever Co TN – d  1956 Harper Co KS);  5 Elijah Henderson (1820 Sever Co TN & Catherine Swann;  6 William Henderson (1786 Cocke Co, TN -1860 & Sever Co TN) & Mary Catherine Cannon;  7 William Henderson & Elizabeth Parrott (1766VA);

25 MARKER – GENETIC DISTANCE - 2     4 MATCH(ES)

 
 

Steve Emerson (Y67)

subseti@hotmail.com

FTDNA Tip

Roy Lee Henderson Jr. (Y37)

henderson373052@bellsouth.net

FTDNA Tip

Richard Lee Henderson (Y67)

ypsi@toast.net

FTDNA Tip

Mr. Ronald Lee Henderson (Y37)

ron_8391_kay@cybermesa.com

GEDCOMFTDNA Tip
37 Marker - Genetic Distance - 2 1 Match(es)
 

In comparing 25 markers, the probability that Steve Emerson and Mr. John E. Sharp shared a common ancestor within the last...

Comparison Chart

4 generations is
7.38%

8 generations is
27.55%

12 generations is
50.12%

16 generations is
68.52%

20 generations is
81.31%

24 generations is
89.39%

 

In comparing 25 markers, the probability that Roy L. Henderson, Jr. and Mr. John E. Sharp shared a common ancestor within the last...Comparison Chart

4 generations is
8.14%

8 generations is
29.73%

12 generations is
53.05%

16 generations is
71.38%

20 generations is
83.63%

24 generations is
91.06%

 

In comparing 25 markers, the probability that  Richard L. Henderson and Mr. John E. Sharp shared a common ancestor within the last...Comparison Chart

4 generations is
8.48%

8 generations is
30.65%

12 generations is
54.24%

16 generations is
72.49%

20 generations is
84.5%

24 generations is
91.67%

 

In comparing 25 markers, the probability that  Mr. Ronald L. Henderson and Mr. John E. Sharp shared a common ancestor within the last...Comparison Chart

4 generations is
7.38%

8 generations is
27.55%

12 generations is
50.12%

16 generations is
68.52%

20 generations is
81.31%

24 generations is
89.39%

 

RONALD HENDERSON ( PENNSYLVANIA)

1 (private); 2 (private) 3 Lee Roy Henderson; 4 Elias Thomas Henderson (1837 Armstrong Co PA )  & Sarah Eliz Frantz;  5 Joseph Henderson (1800 Huntington PA) & Christy Avey; 7 Robert Henderson  d 1804-Derry Ireland

 

37 MARKER – GENETIC DISTANCE - 2     1 MATCH(ES)

 
 

John (sh-62) Shelton

thall451@comcast.net

FTDNA Tip
37 Marker - Genetic Distance - 3 1 Match(es)
 

In comparing 37 markers, the probability that John (. Shelton and Mr. John E. Sharp shared a common ancestor within the last...

Comparison Chart

4 generations is
29.39%

8 generations is
69.25%

12 generations is
89.49%

16 generations is
96.86%

20 generations is
99.14%

24 generations is
99.78%
 
 
 

37 MARKER – GENETIC DISTANCE - 3     1 MATCH(ES)

 
 

David Allen Emerson

kimemersonsanta@centurytel.net

FTDNA Tip
37 Marker - Genetic Distance - 4 2 Match(es)

In comparing 37 markers, the probability that David A. Emerson and Mr. John E. Sharp shared a common ancestor within the last...

Comparison Chart

4 generations is
30.78%

8 generations is
71%

12 generations is
90.52%

16 generations is
97.3%

20 generations is
99.3%

24 generations is
99.83%
 
 
 

37 MARKER – GENETIC DISTANCE - 4     2 MATCH(ES)

 

Everett Glenn Emerson (Y67)

everettege@webtv.net

FTDNA Tip

Mr. F. Robert Henderson

frbhndrs@aol.com

GEDCOMFTDNA Tip

 

In comparing 37 markers, the probability that Everett G. Emerson and Mr. John E. Sharp shared a common ancestor within the last...Comparison Chart

4 generations is
11.25%

8 generations is
45.22%

12 generations is
74.41%

16 generations is
89.99%

20 generations is
96.51%

24 generations is
98.88%

 

 

In comparing 37 markers, the probability that Mr. F. Robert Henderson and Mr. John E. Sharp shared a common ancestor within the last...Comparison Chart

4 generations is
13.71%

8 generations is
51.11%

12 generations is
79.59%

16 generations is
92.95%

20 generations is
97.85%

24 generations is
99.4%

 

ROBERT HENDERSON (TENNESSEE) (lineage per submitted gedcom)

1 Robert Henderson;  2  Frank Paul Henderson; 3 Joseph Melvin Henderson; 4 James Preston Henderson; & Anna Evalista Burchfiel; 5 Elijah Henderson & Catherine Swann;  6 William Henderson  (1786 Cocke Co, TN – 1860 Sever Co TN) &  Mary Catherine Cannon;  7 William Henderson & Elizabeth Parrott (1766 va)

 

 

 

FTDNA DYS markers

We provide the actual scientific Allele values and DYS #'s for your results unless the markers were discovered at the University of Arizona and do not have a publication schedule. When that situation occurs we provide your results in "scores" to allow us to use the marker without compromising the discoverer until publication dates have been established.

We are pleased to report your results below:
Understanding your results.

PANEL 1 (1-12)

Locus

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

DYS#

393

390

19*

391

385a

385b

426

388

439

389-1

392

389-2

Alleles

14

20

15

10

15

15

11

13

11

12

12

31

PANEL 2 (13-25)

Locus

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

DYS#

458

459a

459b

455

454

447

437

448

449

464a**

464b**

464c**

464d**

Alleles

15

8

10

11

12

25

14

20

27

11

14

14

14

PANEL 3 (26-37)

Locus

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

DYS#

460

GATA H4

YCA II a

YCA II b

456

607

576

570

CDY a

CDY b

442

438

Alleles

10

9

19

21

14

16

16

21

33

38

12

10

*Also known as DYS 394

**On 5/19/2003, these values were adjusted down by 1 point because of a change in Lab nomenclature.

***A value of “0” for any marker indicates that the lab reported a null value or no result for this marker. All cases of this nature are retested multiple times by the lab to confirm their accuracy. Mutations causing null values are infrequent, but are passed on to offspring just like other mutations, so related male lineages such as a father and son would likely share any null values.

mtDNA Recent Ancestral Origins

Low Resolution Matches (HVR1)

Haplogroup

Country

Comment

Count

U5

England (5652)

-

1

U5

Germany (6492)

-

1

U5

Netherlands (808)

-

1

U5

Scotland (2439)

-

1