Notes |
- WARREN, BARTON, Charles County, Planter. 3 Feb 1757; 9 March 1757
To wife Elizabeth, 1/3 of plantation whereon I now dwell called "Frailty, and 1/3 of moveable estate,
To sons Notly and John, dwelling plantation called "Frailty," son to have 200 a. next to land of Robt, Yates and son Notley the residue.
To son William Barton Warren, tract In Port Tobacco Hundred known as "Strife."
To brother Thomas Warren, wearing apparel.
To dau. Susannah, bed and furniture, cow, horse.
To son Edward, bed and furniture.
To son Robert. bed and furniture. Remainder of personal estate to be divided between my 8 children., Jane Hungerford, Mary Musgrove, Notley Warren, John Warren,, William Barton Warren, Susannah Watren, Edward Warren and Robert Warren.
Sons Notly and John., exs.
Wit: Chas. Bruce, John Ford, Wm. Brown, 30.275
===
Barton Worren 63.76 CH £853.0.1 Mar 20 1757 Apr 9 1757
(also Barton Warren)
Appraisers: Edward Smoot, Charles Bruce.
Creditors: John Fendall, James Briscoe.
Next of kin: William Barton Warren.
Executors: Notley Warren, John Warren.
===
Capt. Barton Warren 64.280 CH £4.14.0 Jun 6 1758
Appraisers: Edward Smoot, Charles Bruce.
Creditors: John Fendall, James Briscoe.
Next of kin: William Warren, Mary Musgrove.
Executors: Barton Warren, John Warren.
===
Barton Warren 3,78 D CH £859.15.10 Jun 25 1761
Sureties: Robert Yates, Thomas Dalton.
Executors: Notley Warren, John Warren.
===
www.jarboe.org/first_four_generations.htm
Inherited his father's farms, Frailty and Strife. Still a minor in 1705
Sources:
Title: Charles County Gentry
Author: Newman, Harry Wright
Publication: Baltimore County, Maryland: Genealogical Publishing County, 1940
====
1750 Aug Warren, Barton Notley's Addition 450 Rent Rolls St. Clements
1750 Jan Warren, Barton Notley's Addition 450 Rent Rolls St. Clements
====
: Prepared by WILLIAM G SCROGGINS © 2002, revised 2 Jan 2002
: 718 Mill Valley Drive, Taylor Mill, Kentucky 41015-2278 Page 10:22
Jane Warren who married Barton Hungerford was a daughter of Captain Barton Warren, the son of Thomas and Mary Barton Warren. Captain Barton Warren was born in Charles County, Maryland, married (1) ----- ------ and (2) Elizabeth ------, and died in 1757 leaving issue: Notley Warren, born in 1736 and married Sarah ------; John Warren, born in 1773 (1737?) and married Jane ------; William Barton Warren, married Mary Jane Yates and died in 1809; Susannah Warren; Edward Warren; Robert Warren, born on 06 September 1742 and died on 26 October 1826; Jane Warren, married Barton Hungerford;
and Mary Warren, married (1) Harrison Musgrove and (2) John Stone. [History of the Warren, Stone, Dayton, Routh, Wurster, Daggett and Young Families.]
===
John Boarman 33.130 A CH £718.5.0 Jul 31 1752
Sureties: Richard Edelen, Richard Bennet Boarman.
Received from: Abraham Devenport.
Payments to: Joseph Pile, Dr. Gustavus Brown, James Nivison, Henry Jernegan, Dr, Francis Parnham, Robert Scott (merchant in Glasgow) paid to Mr. Walter Hanson, Dan. Jenifer.
Distribution to; widow (unnamed, 1/3). Residue to: Joseph Boarman (of age), Raphael Boarman (aged 16). Richard Boarman (aged 8).
Executrix: Elisabeth Boarman, now wife of Barton Warren.
===
Hawkins, Thomas, Charles County, 13th Nov., 1724; 18th Dec., 1724.
To bro. Alexander, ex., personalty.
Test: Barton Warren, Martha Greive. 18.336,
===
Anne Howard 31.137 CH £381.0.0 Apr 3 1745 Jun 12 1745
Appraisers: Robert Yates, Barton Warren.
Creditors: John Boarman, Mary Neall.
Next of kin: Mary Power [Poore], William Sanders.
Executor: Joseph Lancaster.
===
John Boarman 32.52 A CH £649.13.8 £120.10.3 Feb 8 1752
He died on 4 June. A second inventory is cited in the amount of £0.15.0.
Sureties: Richard Edelin, Richard Bennett Boarman.
Received from: John Oakley, John Scroggan, James Wood, James Ferrell, James Short, James Williams, John Wilder, Thomas Higden.
Payments to: John Scroggan, John Oakly, Richard Jackson, Robert Horner, Walter Hanson, Daniel Dulany, Esq., James Wood, Dr. John Corry, Bennit Boarman, Lord Baltimore paid to Massey Leigh, Daniel Jenifer.
Legatees: & James Ferrell & John Montgomery & Thomas Higdon & James Short & George Hudson, priest (unnamed).
Representatives: administratrix, 3 children: Joseph Boarman (aged 19), Raphael Boarman (aged 15), Richard Boarman (aged 8).
Administratrix: Elisabeth Warren, wife of Barton Warren.
===
Contributed by: James Hughes
URL: http://www.mdarchives.state.md.us/megafile/msa/speccol/sc2900/sc2908/00000 1/000028/html/am28--546.html
URL title: Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1732:1753Volume 28, Page 546
Note:
Schedule No 2.
Charles County.
At a Meeting of the Vestry of William and Mary Parish in the County aforesaid on the 8th Day of June 1752 at the said Parish Church were present - p. 483
The Reverend
Vestrymen: Mr Saml Clagett, Mr Thomas Cottrell, Mr Richard Smith, Mr Edward Ford, Mr Nathan Harris, Mr Charles Bruce
Church warden:Mr John Marshall
Who unanimously proceeded to regulate and assign the Pews in the sd Parish Church to the several Persons hereafter put down in the following Manner, the Numbers of the Pews to the respective Names put down, having Relation to the Numbers in the Platt hereunto annexed Viz.
Pew
To the honourable Richard Lee Esqr 1
Mr Benjamin Fendall & his Son John 2
Mr Wm Courts, Elizabeth Courts & Wm Penn 3
Col George Dent and his Son George 4
Richard Smith his Sons, and Thomas Cottrell 5
Barton Warren and Edward Ford 6
Charles Yates John Wilder & his Son John 7
The Ministers Family for the time being 8
James Latimore, Philip Jenkins, Jno Jenkins & Benj. Douglass. 9
Atwick Fearson, Jno Farr, Geo. Scroggin & Benjn Thomas. 10
Notley Maddox, Sarah Maddox, Anne Smoot & Edwd Smoot 14
Joseph Joy, Judith Penn, and Notley Dutton 15
Thomas Bates, John Douglass, John Hamil & Jane Penn 16
Francis Posey, Harrison Musgrove, Charles John & Benj. Philpot. 18
Authur Lee, Rebecca Howard, Jno Marshall & Richd Marshall 23
Joseph Douglass, Nathan Harris, Mary Brandt 24
Joseph Gwynn and Benjamin 25
Mary Marshall, Henry Thompson, Posthumus Groves & Jas Plant. 26
William Dent & Walter Hanson for their Tenants 27
Moses Hubbart, John Cavin, Jno Wakefield & Saml Chunn 28
Robert Yates, Charles Bruce & Robert Yates junr 29
Barton Hungerford & his Sons 30
Robt Mastin, Tyre Thomas, Widow Thomas & Richard Ratcliff. 31
Thomas Hatton, William Cage Samuel Gody and John Chun 32
Geo: Elgin Patience Posey, Jacob Andrew Minitree Wm Guy & Sarah Martin. 33
No 11, 12, 13, 19, 20, 21, 22 left in common for Tenants
Others not being Freeholders.
No 17 .....for such young Persons that may sing.
===
Charles County Maryland Circuit Court Records, Liber H#2, Page 431
12 Jun 1721; Recorded at request of Barton Warren:
1 Nov 17_; Indenture from Humphry Warren of Hatton Point, Gent., to Josias Fendall, Gent.; for love of Ellen his wife and unto Thomas his youngest son for their maintenance; a tract of land on the west side of Wicomico called ?Frinity granted by patent from the Lord Proprietary 4 Aug 33rd year of the reign of his dominion; (some blank spaces in document); /s/ Josias Fendall
===
1642-1753 Rent Rolls Charles County MD Hundred - Wicomico: Rent Roll page/Sequence: 285-15: FRAILTY: 300 acres; Possession of - 300 Acres - Warren, Thomas: Surveyed 22 June 1663 for Humphrey Warren on the West side Wicomico River: Conveyance notes - Included in Resurvey of Frailty Folio 420, 3 Nov 1730,
===
1642-1753 Rent Rolls Charles County MD Hundred - Wicomico: Rent Roll page/Sequence: 420-304: FRAILTY: acres; Possession of - Acres - Warren, Barton: : Originally so called, Re-Surveyed, 3 Nov 1730 for Barton Warring: {mm Note; not identified to a specific Hundred. Location identified by watercourse or nearby tract.},
===
Provincial Court Land Records, 1749-1756
Volume 701, Page 81
This Indenture Tripartite made the Thirtieth Day of August in the Year of our Lord One Thousand Seven hundred and fifty Between Roger Smith of Charles County in the Province of Maryland Planter and Mary his Wife of the first part Barton Warren of Charles County in the Province aforesaid ^of the second part and Richard Brooke of S.t Marys County in the Province aforesaid^ Planter of the third part Witnesseth that for and in Consideration of the Sum of five Shillings Current Money by him the said Richard Brooke in hand paid to the said Roger Smith and Mary his Wife at or before the ensealing and delivery of these Presents the receipt of which said Sum of five Shillings is hereby respectively Acknowledged and the said Richard Brooke his Executors and Administrators thereof and therefrom for ever by these Presents Acquitted and Discharged And for the Docking Barring and Extinguishing all Estates Tail and all eversions and Remainders thereupon expectant or depending of and in the Lands Tenements and Hereditaments herein after mentioned They the said Roger Smith and Mary his Wife Have Granted Bargained Sold Aliened Released and Confirmed and by these
Presents Do Grant Bargain Sell Alien Release and Confirm unto the said Richard Brooke (in the Actual Possession of the said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments herein after mentioned now being by Virtue of a Bargain and Sale to him thereof made by the said Roger Smith and Mary his Wife for five Shillings Consideration by Indenture bearing date the day next before the day of the date thereof and by force of the Statute for Transferring Uses into Possession) and to his Heirs All that Tract or Parcel of Plantable Land Situate lying and being in Chaptico in Saint Mary's County afs.d
called Notley's Addition containing four hundred and fifty Acres of Land more or less with the Appurtenances thereto belonging or in any wise appertaining and the Reversion and Reversions Remainder and Remainders Rents Issues and Profits of the said Lands Tenements and Hereditaments and Premisses with their and every of their Appurtenances and all the Estate Right Title Interest Use Trust Property Possession Claim and Demand whatsoever both at Law and in Equity of him the said Roger Smith and Mary his Wife of in or to the said Lands Tenements Hereditaments and Premisses hereby Granted and Released or mentioned or Intended so to be with their and every of their Appurtenances unto the said Richard Brooke his Heirs and Assigns to and for the Use and behoof of the said Richard Brooke his Heirs and Assigns forever to the Intent and Purpose that he the said Richard Brooke may be perfect Tenant of the Freehold of the said Premisses that a Common Recovery may be had and suffered against him in such manner as is herein after mentioned And for that Purpose it is Covenanted and Agree by and between all other said parties to these Presents that before the end of next September Term or some other ensuing Term at the Costs
and Charges of the said Roger Smith and Mary his Wife one or more Writ or Writs of Entry Sur Disseisin en le Post shall and may be brought Commenced and Prosecuted out of his Lordships high Court of Chancery returnable and to be returned before his Lordships Justices of the Provincial Court at Annapolis in the Name of the said Barton Warren as Plaintiff for Demandant against the said Richard Brooke as Tenant whereby the said Barton Warren shall demand against the said Richard Brooke the said Lands Tenements Hereditaments and Premisses herein before Granted and released or mentioned or Intended so to be with their and every of their Appurtenances by such Apt and Convenient Names and Descriptions as shall be thought proper to ascertain the same to which Writ the said Richard Brooke
shall appear Gratis in his own Proper Person or by his Attorney or Attorneys Lawfully Authorized ^and shall Vouch to Warrant the same Premisses the said Roger Smith & Mary his Wife who shall appear Gratis in their own proper Persons or by their Attorney or Attorneys Lawfully Authorized and enter into the said Warranty and Vouch over to Warrant the same Premisses the Common Vouchee of the same Court who shall thereupon appear^ and enter into the said Warranty and after Imparlance make default and depart in Contempt
of the Court so that one or more common Recovery or Recoverys shall and may be had and Suffered of the said Premisses with proper Judgments to be thereupon given and Execution Awarded according to the course of Common Recoverys for Assurance of Lands and Tenements in like Cases Used and Accustomed And it is hereby declared and Agreed by and between all the said Parties to these Presents That from and after the suffering and perfecting the said Recovery or Recoverys as well these Presents and the Assurance hereby made as also the said Common Recovery or Recoverys so as afsd or in any other manner or at any other time or times
had or Suffered or to be had or Suffered by or between the said partys to these Presents or any of them their or any of their Heirs and all and every other Common Recovery or Recoverys fines Conveyances and Assurances in the Law whatsoever already had made levyed Suffered or Executed or hereafter to be ^had^ made Levyed Suffered or Executed of the said Lands Tenements Hereditaments and Premisses or any part thereof by or between the said parties to these Presents or any of them or whereunto they or any of them shall be parties or privies shall be and enure and shall
be Adjudged Deemed Construed and taken and are and were meant and intended and are hereby declared to be and enure and the Recoveror & Recoverors in the said Recovery or Recoverys Named or to be Named and his and their Heirs shall stand and be Seized of the said Lands Tenements
Hereditaments and Premisses and every part thereof to and for the only proper Use and behoofe of the said Roger Smith and Mary his Wife and of their Heirs and Assigns forever and to and for no other Use Intent or Purpose whatsoever In Witness whereof the said parties to these Presents
have hereunto Interchangeably set their hands and Seals the day and Year first above Written Roger Smith seal Sealed and Delivered Collin Mitchell Mary Smith seal in the Presence of Rob.t Whythill Barton Warren seal Sealed & Delivered Richard Brooke seal in the Presence of J Chase On the back of the aforegoing Deed was thus Endorsed (Viz.t)
Maryland Charles County to wit August 30.th 1750 Then came before me the Subscriber one of his Lordships the Lord Proprietarys Justices of the Provincial Court of the Province of Maryland aforesaid the parties to the within Indenture who Severally Acknowledged the same to be their Act and Deed for the Uses Intents and Purposes therein mentioned according to the true Intent and meaning thereof At the same time came also Mary within mentioned, Wife to the within mentioned Roger Smith who being by me first privately and apart from her said Husband Examined Acknowledged the within Indenture to be her Act and Deed for the Uses Intents and Purposes therein mentioned according
to the true Intent and meaning thereof and that she did the same freely Willingly and of their own Accord without being forced or Induced thereto by her said Husband or through fear of his Displeasure Taken and Acknowledged before me according to Law the day and Year aforesaid Recorded Sept.r 14.th 1750 Geo Dent
http://wc.rootsweb.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=GET&db=mrmarsha&id=I03659
|